Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding template for AuthRules in EH #2378

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2016
Merged

Adding template for AuthRules in EH #2378

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2016

Conversation

sazeesha
Copy link
Contributor

@azurecla
Copy link

Hi @sazeesha, I'm your friendly neighborhood Azure Pull Request Bot (You can call me AZPRBOT). Thanks for your contribution!


It looks like you're working at Microsoft (sazeesha). If you're full-time, we DON'T require a contribution license agreement.



If you are a vendor, DO please sign the electronic contribution license agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.azure.com.

TTYL, AZPRBOT;

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
# 301-eventHub-create-authrule-namespace-and-eventHub
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need a better name rather than just template folder name here. Also is there a reason folder name isn't all lower-case?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem like a 301 template, more like 201. There's only a few resources in this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Complexity of a template for our service is defined by the type of resource being created and not just the number. Besides there a lot going on in this template. eg: some resources need to be created serially and that needs the correct use of dependson property. A lot of customers have reported this issue and it needs to addressed via a template.

@sazeesha
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can anyone review this? we have customers waiting for this template.

@gatneil
Copy link
Contributor

gatneil commented Aug 23, 2016

Normally we'd ask that you use a raw string for apiVersion instead of a variable, but this case the user is passing in the apiVersion via parameter, so that advice doesn't really make sense; looks good; merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants